It is curious that the potential 'spiking' of other products has been so completely over-looked, although the deposition from that Australian rugby player is hardly conclusive given his inability to accurately state what he took and when.
However, that is, I now believe, moot. And whilst I applaud Predator trying to protect their investment, it's becoming increasingly like the story of the little Dutch boy and his dike-saving digit. I mean, how do you rally against Craze being dropped by Bodybuilding.com?
Yet, I still find it hard to believe that despite his dirty past Matt Cahill would risk a return to prison, for what would likely be very serious time. He's also demonstrated (in his video deposition) that he doesn't have the knowledge to so cleverly formulate such a well hidden analogue (as 'eth'). Which begs the wider question of who does, and then who benefits?
It may even be state sponsored as a means of increasing regulation - the US are big on that. And if not state sponsored it will certainly lead to greater regulation. And probably towards PEA and it's analogues, and the use of plant derivatives (dendrobium, acacia, etc).